![]() ![]() In your process, are you creating copies of pictures, ending up with the same file at different places? I have the same question, also coming from Picasa where the photo editing was easy but somewhat limited, but the virtual album and online upload management was incredibly easy compared to any alternative I found so far. When I was done with that task, I would then "untag" the remaining photos. Eventually, I would winnow out the weaker photos for illustration purposes and then move copies of the strongest photos to the article folder. Then I would create a (temporary) smart collection of tagged candidate photos for secondary review, untagging any photos that were weaker than others. In that case, as I reviewed photos, the photos that I thought might work for the article would get tagged. ![]() In my mind, the ACDSee 'Tag' is not a permanent thing, like a Keyword or a Category., but rather a temporary marker for resolving maintenance issues.įor instance, let's say I'm writing an article for my blog and want to find some suitable photos for illustrations. I want the database to be my repository, and any auxillary folders to facilitate special situations. Sorry, I don't do Albums, I've a few collections though, and some special use folders that contain copies of photos from the database. It has a rich management set that allows for people to find their own useage rules. I also haven't tagged any photo, nor do I plan to.Everyone uses ACDSee a bit differently, that's one of the reasons I like it. Not every photo is worth of being in an album. What about your album? Unless I've missed something, Sets and Collections seems to be the old way to create Albums. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |